Radon carbon dating

Posted by / 27-Jun-2020 04:20

They found large variations in the radiocarbon 'dates' of objects of known age sent to 38 radiocarbon 'dating' laboratories around the world.

Thirty-one of the labs gave results that the British group called unsatisfactory.

However, because it has too many neutrons for the number of protons it contains, it is not a stable atom.

Every 5,730 years, approximately half of this radioactive carbon spontaneously converts itself back into nitrogen by emitting an electron from a neutron.

But in actual practice, we know neither the original ratios nor if the specimen has been contaminated and are forced to make what we hope are reasonable assumptions.

The tiny initial amount of C14, the relatively rapid rate of decay (the half-life of C14 is currently about 5700 years) and the ease with which samples can become contaminated make radiocarbon dating results for samples "older" than about 50,000 years effectively meaningless.

This collision is less destructive than the initial collision that produced them.The carbon dioxide is absorbed by plants, and the plants are eaten by animals, thus contaminating every living thing on earth with radioactive carbon. As time passes, the C14 in its tissues is converted back into nitrogen.If we know what the original ratios of C14 to C12 were in the organism when it died, and if we know that the sample has not been contaminated by contact with other carbon since its death, we should be able to calculate when it died by its C14 to C12 ratio.Radiocarbon dating has somehow avoided collapse onto its own battered foundation, and now lurches onward with feigned consistency.The implications of pervasive contamination and ancient variations in carbon-14 levels are steadfastly ignored by those who base their argument upon the dates.

radon carbon dating-73radon carbon dating-89radon carbon dating-28

The nitrogen atom, which began with seven protons and seven neutrons, is left with only six protons and eight neutrons.